Cross-Border Business Partnerships in Bangladesh: Legal Framework and Agreement Structuring for Foreign Investors
Introduction
Foreign investors can enter Bangladesh with 100% ownership in most sectors and without prior approval, but the value of any partnership depends on how well it is registered, funded and documented. Bangladesh is a common-law jurisdiction: its contract, company and arbitration statutes follow English models, so a well-drafted agreement is enforced much as an investor would expect at home.
The practical risks lie elsewhere. Foreign exchange is tightly controlled by Bangladesh Bank, some sectors require licences, and local partners may hold more practical influence than their shareholding suggests. This guide sets out, first, the legal provisions that govern cross-border partnerships and, second, how to structure commercial agreements so that a foreign investor's capital, control and exit are protected.
Part I – Legal Provisions Governing Cross-Border Business Partnerships
No single statute governs cross-border partnerships. A foreign investor's position rests on five layers: investment-protection law, the vehicle law, the investment authority, foreign-exchange control, and dispute-resolution law.
1. Investment protection: the Foreign Private Investment (Promotion and Protection) Act, 1980
The 1980 Act remains the foundation of investor protection. It promises fair and equitable treatment, protection and security of foreign investment, compensation if an investment is expropriated or nationalised, and the right to repatriate capital and returns (Section 8). Foreign investors are treated no less favourably than local investors, and no prior approval is generally required for foreign direct investment.
These guarantees operate alongside, not above, foreign-exchange rules. In practice the right to repatriate is exercised through Bangladesh Bank procedures, so the contract must be drafted to fit those procedures.
2. The new investment authority: Invest Bangladesh Act, 2026
The Invest Bangladesh Act, 2026 came into force on 20 August 2026. It merged BIDA, BEZA and the PPP Authority into a single statutory body, Invest Bangladesh, under the Prime Minister's Office. Four statutes were repealed and consolidated:
Bangladesh Investment Development Authority Act, 2016
Bangladesh Economic Zones Act, 2010
Public-Private Partnership Act, 2015
One Stop Service Act, 2018
Invest Bangladesh now handles project registration, work permits, branch and liaison office permissions, economic-zone allotments and PPP structuring. It continues to run the BanglaBiz single digital portal. Agreements, board resolutions and filings that still refer to "BIDA" or "BEZA" should be updated to the new authority and the new Act.
3. Choice of vehicle
| Vehicle | Governing law | Typical use | Key point for the foreign partner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Private limited company (joint venture company) | Companies Act, 1994 | Most long-term partnerships | Limited liability; up to 100% foreign shareholding in most sectors; registered with RJSC |
| Public limited company | Companies Act, 1994; securities law | Larger projects, later listing | Heavier disclosure; BSEC rules on share issues |
| Branch or liaison office | Companies Act, 1994 (Part X); Invest Bangladesh permission | Testing the market, project execution | No separate entity; liaison office cannot earn local income |
| Unincorporated JV, consortium or association (JVCA) | Contract Act, 1872; Bangladesh Bank JVCA Guidelines | Government tenders and development projects | Profit repatriation needs prior Bangladesh Bank approval |
| Partnership firm | Partnership Act, 1932 | Rare for foreign investors | Unlimited, joint and several liability |
For almost every foreign investor, an incorporated joint venture company is the safest vehicle. Liability is limited and shareholder rights can be written into the Articles of Association.
4. Contract law limits
Every partnership agreement is tested against the Contract Act, 1872. Three provisions matter most:
Section 23 – an agreement with an unlawful object or consideration, or one opposed to public policy, is void.
Section 27 – an agreement in restraint of trade is void, subject to narrow exceptions. Post-exit non-compete clauses must be drafted carefully.
Section 28 – an agreement restricting a party's right to go to court is void, but arbitration agreements are expressly saved.
The Specific Relief Act, 1877 governs injunctions and specific performance. It is the main route to stop a local partner from breaching exclusivity or transfer restrictions.
5. Foreign-exchange control
Bangladesh Bank administers the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 through the Guidelines for Foreign Exchange Transactions (GFET) and periodic circulars. Every cross-border flow must pass through an Authorised Dealer (AD) bank.
| Transaction | Current rule | Approval |
|---|---|---|
| Bringing in equity | Through banking channels; AD issues encashment certificate; report to Bangladesh Bank | None in most sectors |
| Dividends to non-resident shareholders | Remitted via AD after tax, with audited accounts and board resolution (FEPD Circular 40, 30 Sep 2026) | Post-facto checking by Bangladesh Bank |
| Service fees to foreign parent (subsidiary >50% foreign-owned) | Capped at 10% of net profit per year | Above 10% needs Bangladesh Bank approval |
| Royalty, technical know-how and franchise fees | Under the 2021 investment authority guidelines | Within limits via AD; above limits needs approval |
| Profit of an unincorporated JVCA | Under FEID Circular 02 of 20 Nov 2024 | Prior Bangladesh Bank approval |
| Sale of shares to a resident / exit proceeds | Repatriable up to a fair value supported by a valuation report | Bangladesh Bank approval |
The September 2026 remittance circular is valid for one year, so remittance clauses should refer to "applicable Bangladesh Bank regulations as amended" rather than to fixed figures.
6. Tax, labour and sector rules
Income Tax Act, 2023 – governs corporate tax, withholding on dividends, royalties and service fees, and transfer pricing on related-party payments. Double taxation treaties can reduce withholding rates.
Labour Act, 2006 – applies to the joint venture's workforce, including the Workers' Profit Participation Fund where applicable. Foreign staff need work permits.
Sector licences – banking, insurance, telecommunications, power and similar sectors need separate regulator approval and may carry ownership limits. A small reserved list (such as arms and security printing) is closed to private investment.
Special zones – export processing zones (BEPZA) and hi-tech parks retain their own incentive regimes.
7. Dispute resolution
Arbitration Act, 2001 – based on the UNCITRAL Model Law. Sections 45–47 provide for recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards.
New York Convention – Bangladesh is a party, so awards made in Singapore, London or other Convention states are enforceable here. Foreign court judgments are much harder to enforce.
Commercial courts – specialised commercial courts began operating under the Commercial Court Ordinance, 2026 (in force 1 January 2026), later enacted as an Act, to speed up commercial disputes.
Treaty protection – Bangladesh has bilateral investment treaties with many capital-exporting states and is a member of ICSID, giving qualifying investors a further route against state action.
Part II – Structuring Effective Commercial Agreements to Secure Foreign Investors' Interests
A foreign investor is protected by the whole document set, not by one clever clause. The core set is a Joint Venture or Shareholders' Agreement, Articles of Association that mirror it, and the side agreements (technology licence, supply, management services) through which value actually flows.
1. Make the Articles carry the deal
Bangladeshi courts look first to the company's Memorandum and Articles of Association. A veto, pre-emption right or board seat that sits only in the Shareholders' Agreement may bind the shareholders personally but may not bind the company or a new shareholder.
Write every governance and transfer right into the Articles, and adopt them before completion.
Add a clause that the Shareholders' Agreement prevails between the parties, and a covenant to amend the Articles if a conflict appears.
File the amended Articles with RJSC so third parties have notice.
2. Key clauses and how each protects the investor
| Clause | What it protects | Bangladesh-specific drafting point |
|---|---|---|
| Conditions precedent | Money is not committed before approvals | Make Invest Bangladesh registration, sector licences and RJSC filings conditions of each funding tranche |
| Capital contribution | Proof of foreign capital | Fund only through an AD bank and keep encashment certificates; they are needed later to repatriate |
| Reserved matters (veto list) | Control despite a minority stake | Cover budget, new shares, borrowing, related-party deals, dividends, change of business, winding up; repeat in Articles |
| Board and quorum | Real say in management | Guarantee nominee directors; quorum requires an investor director; allow video attendance |
| Information and audit rights | Visibility of the money | Monthly accounts, right to appoint auditor, access to bank statements and tax filings |
| Dividend policy | Regular returns | Commit to distribute a set share of distributable profit; tie timing to audit and tax clearance so the AD bank can remit |
| Transfer restrictions | Keeps the partner fixed | Lock-in period, pre-emption, right of first refusal, change-of-control trigger for the local partner |
| Tag-along and drag-along | Fair exit | Price and terms for non-residents must still meet Bangladesh Bank fair-value rules |
| Put and call options | Guaranteed exit route | State a valuation method (independent valuer, agreed formula) that will produce an acceptable valuation report |
| Deadlock | Prevents paralysis | Escalation to chairmen, then mediation, then buy-sell ("Russian roulette" or "Texas shoot-out") or put option |
| Non-compete and exclusivity | Protects the business and know-how | Valid while the partner holds shares; after exit keep it short, local and tied to goodwill (Contract Act s.27) |
| IP and technology licence | Retains ownership of core assets | License, do not assign, IP to the JV; royalties within investment authority limits; terminate licence on exit |
| Related-party service fees | Value from management support | Keep within the 10% of net profit cap or plan for Bangladesh Bank approval; support with transfer-pricing documents |
| Anti-corruption and compliance | Reputation and liability | Warranties, audit rights and termination for breach; covers home-country laws (FCPA, UK Bribery Act) |
| Default events | Remedy against a bad partner | Breach, insolvency, fraud or change of control triggers a call option at a discount |
| Governing law and disputes | Neutral, enforceable forum | See section 3 below |
3. Dispute resolution that can actually be enforced
Arbitration over courts. A foreign court judgment is difficult to enforce in Bangladesh, but a New York Convention award is enforceable under section 45 of the Arbitration Act, 2001.
Seat. Singapore (SIAC) or London (LCIA/ICC) gives a neutral forum and a supportive supervisory court. Dhaka (BIAC) is cheaper and suits smaller disputes.
Clause content. State the seat, rules, number of arbitrators, language (English) and that the award is final and binding.
Interim relief. Expressly allow either party to seek injunctions from the High Court Division or commercial courts in Bangladesh, where the assets are.
Governing law. Bangladeshi law is often chosen for the Shareholders' Agreement because the company is Bangladeshi. Side agreements such as licences can use English or Singapore law.
Treaty structuring. Holding the investment through a company in a country with a Bangladesh investment treaty can add protection against state action.
4. Protecting the exit
Exit is where most foreign investors lose value. Plan it on day one:
Keep a full record of encashment certificates, share allotment returns and Bangladesh Bank reporting from the first remittance.
Agree the valuation method in advance and use a method Bangladesh Bank will accept.
Require the local partner and the company to cooperate with all repatriation filings, with an indemnity for delay caused by their default.
Allow sale to a third party or a group company if the local partner will not buy.
Obtain tax clearance and settle all liabilities before final repatriation of residual assets.
5. Securing the local partner's obligations
Personal or corporate guarantees from the local partner's parent or principals.
Pledge of the local partner's shares in the JV company in favour of the investor, recorded with the company.
Escrow or staged payment for contributions in kind, such as land, with title verified before transfer.
Clear rules on land and premises: lease or transfer to the JV company, mutation and registration completed before funding.
Part III – Risks in Practice and How the Investor's Interest Is Protected
Most losses suffered by foreign investors in Bangladesh come from two sources: the operating environment, and a local partner who gains practical control on the ground. Both risks can be reduced by documents, structure and early legal action.
1. Difficulties a foreign investor may face
| Difficulty | How it affects the investor | Legal protection |
|---|---|---|
| Multiple approvals and delay | Licences, utility connections, work permits and RJSC filings take longer than planned | Make approvals conditions precedent; register through Invest Bangladesh/BanglaBiz; long-stop dates with right to withdraw |
| Repatriation delays | Dividends or exit proceeds held up at the AD bank or Bangladesh Bank | Keep encashment certificates and filings from day one; annual audit and tax clearance on time; partner duty to cooperate with remittance filings |
| Frequent policy and tax changes | Circulars often valid for one year; tax rates and withholding change in each budget | Change-in-law clause; price adjustment in supply and service contracts; treaty-based holding structure; stabilisation clause in government/PPP contracts |
| Currency depreciation | Taka returns lose value in dollar terms | Hard-currency pricing where permitted; foreign currency accounts for export earnings; indexation clauses |
| Slow courts | Civil suits may take years | Arbitration clause; commercial courts for urgent matters; interim injunction under section 7A of the Arbitration Act, 2001 |
| Land and title defects | Disputed land, unmutated records, forged deeds | Title search over 25+ years; mutation and registration before funding; title indemnity from the transferor |
| Corruption and informal demands | Pressure for facilitation payments; liability under home-country laws | Anti-bribery warranties; audit rights; termination for breach; documented compliance programme |
| Transfer pricing and tax audits | Related-party fees and royalties challenged | Arm's-length documentation; keep within the 10% service-fee cap; advance tax opinions |
| Labour and expatriate issues | Wage disputes, WPPF claims, delayed work permits | Labour Act compliance audit; written employment contracts; budget time for permits |
2. Problems commonly faced with a local partner
| Problem | Typical example | Legal protection and remedy |
|---|---|---|
| Diversion of funds | Company money moved to the partner's other firms; inflated invoices | Dual signatories on all bank accounts; reserved-matter veto on payments above a limit; criminal breach of trust and cheating complaints (Penal Code ss.406, 420) |
| Unauthorised RJSC filings | Directors or shareholding changed by filing forms without the investor's consent | Monitor RJSC records regularly; challenge filings; forgery complaints (Penal Code ss.467, 468, 471); rectification of the share register by the court |
| Competing business | Partner runs a parallel company using the JV's customers and know-how | Non-compete and exclusivity while a shareholder; confidentiality; injunction under the Specific Relief Act, 1877; default call option |
| Withholding information | Accounts, bank statements or minutes not shared | Information and audit rights; investor-appointed auditor; statutory right to inspect registers and accounts under the Companies Act, 1994 |
| Blocking dividends or growth | Partner votes against dividends or new capital to pressure the investor | Agreed dividend policy; deadlock procedure; put option at fair value |
| Oppression of the minority | Majority partner runs the company against the investor's interests | Application to the High Court Division for relief against oppression (Companies Act, 1994, s.233); winding up on just and equitable grounds as last resort |
| Assets and IP in the partner's name | Land, licences or trademark registered to the partner personally | Assets owned by the JV company; trademarks registered in the investor's name and licensed to the JV (Trademarks Act, 2009) |
| Pressure through criminal cases | Cheque-dishonour or fabricated complaints against foreign directors or staff | Avoid personal cheques and guarantees; prompt legal response including anticipatory bail and quashing applications in the High Court Division |
| Refusal to cooperate on exit | Partner will not sign transfer documents or valuation filings | Power of attorney and pre-signed transfer documents held in escrow; specific performance; cost and delay indemnity |
| Partner's own insolvency or dispute | Partner's creditors or family claim against its JV shares | Share pledge to the investor; change-of-control and insolvency default events; restriction on encumbering shares |
3. How the investor's interest can be well protected
Protection works best in layers, set up before money is invested:
Due diligence first. Verify the partner's RJSC records, litigation, tax status, CIB report, land title and reputation before signing.
The right vehicle. Use a private limited company in which the investor holds shares directly, rather than an informal or nominee arrangement.
Matching documents. Shareholders' Agreement and Articles of Association carrying the same vetoes, board rights, transfer restrictions and exit options (see Part II).
Financial controls. Investor-nominated finance head or CFO, dual bank signatories, approved annual budget, and independent auditor.
Ownership of key assets. Land, licences, IP and contracts held by the company or the investor, never by the partner personally.
Security for performance. Share pledge, parent guarantee, escrowed transfer documents and a default call option at a discount.
Enforceable dispute route. Arbitration seated in a New York Convention state, with express right to interim relief from Bangladeshi courts.
Regulatory record. Complete Invest Bangladesh, RJSC and Bangladesh Bank filings so capital and profits can always be repatriated.
Treaty cover. Where the investment is large, hold it through a company in a state that has an investment treaty with Bangladesh.
Early legal action. At the first sign of diversion, false filings or criminal pressure, act quickly: injunctions, criminal complaints and court applications are far more effective at an early stage.
Part IV – How Bangladeshi Courts Protect Foreign Investors
The Supreme Court of Bangladesh has repeatedly enforced the promises made to foreign investors. Over two decades, the High Court Division has quashed arbitrary cancellations and ordered regulators to decide applications they had sat on. It has struck down unlawful charges and tax demands, protected concessions while arbitration went ahead, and restored foreign shareholders' rights against a local partner's fraud.
1. The law the courts enforce
Foreign Private Investment (Promotion and Protection) Act, 1980. Section 4 promises fair and equitable treatment and full protection and security. Section 5 bars unilateral adverse changes to a sanction or permission. Section 7 restricts expropriation to a public purpose against prompt compensation, and section 8 guarantees repatriation. The courts treat sections 4 and 5 as enforceable law, not policy statements.
Constitution. Article 31 (protection of law) extends to foreigners and to companies registered in Bangladesh. Articles 27 (equality) and 40 (freedom of trade) also apply. Article 102 lets the High Court Division enforce them all.
Arbitration Act, 2001. Section 7A allows interim protection before, during and after arbitration, including foreign-seated arbitration. Section 45 enforces foreign awards.
Companies Act, 1994. Section 43 (rectification of the share register) and section 233 (oppression of minority shareholders) protect foreign shareholders inside the company.
Can a foreign company go to court? Yes. In Northpole (BD) Ltd. v. BEPZA, the High Court Division held that a foreign-owned company cannot enforce Part III fundamental rights under Article 102(1). It can, however, apply under Article 102(2) as a "person aggrieved" by any authority that fails to act in accordance with law.
2. Leading decisions: protection against the State and regulators
| Case | Citation | What happened | What the court held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Northpole (BD) Ltd. v. BEPZA | 57 DLR 631 (HCD, 2004) | 100% foreign-owned firm with USD 6 million invested; BEPZA left a product application undecided for years | Inaction is reviewable: "a person may be treated to his detriment not only by action but also inaction". Sections 4 and 5 of the 1980 Act enforced; BEPZA ordered to decide within 2 months |
| HKD International (CEPZ) Ltd. v. BEPZA | 19 BLC 298 (HCD, 2012) | BEPZA cancelled a no-objection certificate 8 months after the investor had restructured on the strength of it | Cancellation set aside. Promissory estoppel binds the authority; "it seems to the Authority" is no lawful reason |
| Universal Jeans Ltd. v. BEPZA | 20 BLC 643 (HCD, 2015) | BEPZA ordered removal of generators it had approved unconditionally and billed a 10% "service charge" | Directives and invoices quashed. No fee without a service rendered; no unilateral withdrawal of an approval investors relied on (1980 Act ss.4–5) |
| Bureau Veritas v. Government of Bangladesh | 30 BLC 337 (HCD, 2020) | Tax department reopened assessments to deny a foreign-owned EPZ laboratory its 10-year tax holiday | All assessments and notices quashed; further action prohibited. Writ allowed without first exhausting tax appeals, as the authority exceeded its jurisdiction |
| UTI Pership (Pvt.) Ltd. v. Bangladesh | 24 BLC 743 (HCD, 2015) | Trade body refused to renew a Sri Lankan forwarder's membership, threatening its customs licence | Renewal directed. The Government's duty under section 4 of the 1980 Act reaches bodies it regulates |
| Abul Khair Tobacco Co. Ltd. v. Government | 23 ALR (HCD) 1 (2020) | Manufacturer relied on a budget speech to resist a change in duty | A budget speech creates no enforceable expectation, but a retrospective repeal wiping out accrued rights was struck down |
3. Leading decisions: contracts, concessions and arbitration
| Case | Citation | What happened | What the court held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jamuna Resort Ltd. v. Bangladesh Bridge Authority | 36 BLD 561 (HCD, 2016) | Malaysian–Nepali JV's 30-year concession cancelled on 7 days' notice despite a 3-month cure period | Status quo maintained under section 7A. Arbitration starts when notice of arbitration is served; arbitrary termination of a foreign-invested concession offends the 1980 Act |
| Southern Solar Power Ltd. v. BPDB | 16 ALR (HCD) 91 (2019) | Singapore-promoted 200 MW solar project; BPDB moved to terminate the PPA; ICC arbitration seated in Hong Kong | Section 7A applies to foreign-seated arbitration; BPDB restrained from terminating for 60 days. But the on-demand bank guarantee could still be encashed (no injunction without egregious fraud) |
| Karnafully Fertilizer Co. (KAFCO) v. Government | 40 BLD 438 (HCD, 2018) | International JV claimed the Government broke written "assurances" by leasing promised land to another firm | Rule discharged: the assurances were contractual, given as a shareholder and not expressed in the President's name (Article 145). A writ lies for breach of contract only in five exceptional cases |
4. Leading decision: protection against a local partner
Chow Wen Chang v. S.F. Winsome Fashion Ltd., 65 DLR 584 (HCD, 2013). Two foreign shareholder-directors held two-thirds of a garments company. Without a meeting, notice or quorum, the Bangladeshi managing director allotted 10,500 new shares to himself and his relatives. He then sold the company's land to his own company, which resold it.
The court rectified the share register under section 43 of the Companies Act, 1994 and declared both sale deeds void. It also directed the Sub-Registrar to cancel them and awarded costs. The allotment breached the Articles and the pre-emption rule in section 155. The local partner argued that the foreigners lacked Bangladesh Bank approval under FERA. The court rejected this: foreign investors using their own funds need no prior permission. Fraud vitiated everything, and a later buyer took no title.
This is the clearest authority that the courts will undo a local partner's dilution and asset-stripping. It also shows why the Articles' quorum and pre-emption rules (Part II) matter.
5. Leading decisions: foreign bidders in public tenders
| Case | Citation | Holding useful to a foreign bidder |
|---|---|---|
| Ekushey Television Ltd. v. Dr. Chowdhury Mahmood Hasan | 54 DLR (AD) 130 (2002) | Any change to tender terms must be told to every bidder; the court reviews the manner and procedure of evaluation and may call for the files |
| SSA Bangladesh Ltd. v. Engineer Mahmud-ul-Islam | 24 BLD (AD) 92 (2003) | State contracts and concessions must normally go to competitive bidding; private negotiation without advertisement offends Articles 27, 31 and 40 |
| Shohoz-Synesis-Vincen JV v. CPTU | 16 SCOB [2022] HCD 25 | Review Panel decision quashed for mishandling limitation; time for a complaint runs from tender opening |
| Roots Developments Ltd. v. Review Panel-2, BPPA | WP 6624 of 2024 (HCD, 13 Aug 2025) | Review Panel decision quashed: it sat with two members instead of three and exceeded its recommendatory powers |
6. The limits investors should know
No immunity for a tainted deal. In Ekushey Television and SSA Bangladesh, licences and concessions obtained through non-transparent processes were struck down even though foreign money was involved. Foreign investors "take the risk" of a deal that was unlawfully made.
Pure contract claims go to arbitration or civil suit. Karnafully shows a writ will not enforce an ordinary contract with the Government.
Policy changes are not enough. Courts review legality and fairness, not the wisdom of fiscal policy (Abul Khair).
On-demand guarantees are hard to stop. Unless there is clear fraud, the guarantee will be paid (Southern Solar).
7. What this means when structuring the deal
Keep every approval, NOC and letter, and record what you invested in reliance on it. Promissory estoppel and section 5 of the 1980 Act depend on that proof.
Ask for government undertakings to be executed in the President's name under Article 145, or within a statutory framework, so that public-law remedies remain open.
Include an arbitration clause with clear notice and cure periods. Section 7A relief is strongest where the authority ignores them.
Negotiate performance security as conditional, not purely on-demand, where possible.
Win the contract through a clean, documented process. A transparent award is also the best defence against a later challenge.
Write quorum, pre-emption and reserved-matter rules into the Articles, so the court can apply them against a local partner, as in Chow Wen Chang.
Case summaries are drawn from The Justice Corner's Case Digest on writ jurisdiction in contractual disputes with public bodies (October 2026). Check citations and later treatment before relying on them in court.
Practical Checklist for Foreign Investors
☐ Confirm the sector is open and identify any licence or ownership cap
☐ Carry out due diligence on the local partner: RJSC records, litigation, tax, land title, CIB report
☐ Choose the vehicle (usually a private limited JV company)
☐ Register the project with Invest Bangladesh through BanglaBiz
☐ Sign the JV or Shareholders' Agreement and adopt matching Articles of Association
☐ Remit capital through an AD bank and collect encashment certificates
☐ Put licence, supply and service agreements in place within Bangladesh Bank limits
☐ Use an arbitration clause seated in a New York Convention state
☐ Agree dividend policy, valuation method and exit routes in writing
☐ Review documents after each new Bangladesh Bank circular or change in investment law
The Justice Corner: Expertise in Cross-Border Transactions and Investor Protection
The Justice Corner is a Dhaka chamber that acts for foreign investors and their Bangladeshi partners from the first enquiry to final exit. Led by a Barrister of the Middle Temple who practises before the Supreme Court of Bangladesh, the chamber combines English-law drafting with day-to-day experience of Bangladeshi regulators and courts. Foreign clients receive advice in clear English, on agreements that are built to be enforced here.
Our areas of expertise
| Area | What we do for foreign investors |
|---|---|
| Market entry and structuring | Advise on sector restrictions, choice of vehicle, holding structures and investment-treaty cover; incorporate JV companies, branches and liaison offices |
| Regulatory approvals | Handle Invest Bangladesh registration through BanglaBiz, RJSC filings, sector licences and work permits for expatriate staff |
| Partner due diligence | Investigate the local partner's corporate records, litigation, tax, credit (CIB) and land title before any money moves |
| Transaction documents | Draft and negotiate Joint Venture and Shareholders' Agreements, Articles of Association, share subscription and purchase agreements, technology licences, distribution, supply and management services agreements |
| Foreign-exchange compliance | Structure capital inflows, dividends, royalties and service fees to fit FERA, the GFET and current Bangladesh Bank circulars; assist with repatriation and exit approvals |
| Government and infrastructure contracts | Advise foreign contractors and JV/consortium partners on public tenders, PPP projects and contract claims against public bodies |
| Corporate governance | Act as company secretary adviser, review board and shareholder resolutions, and monitor RJSC records against unauthorised filings |
| Dispute resolution | Represent investors in partner disputes, minority oppression and rectification proceedings in the High Court Division; arbitration under the Arbitration Act, 2001 and BIAC; enforcement of foreign arbitral awards |
| Criminal-pressure defence | Respond quickly when a partner uses criminal complaints as leverage, including anticipatory bail and quashing applications |
| Exit and restructuring | Plan share transfers, valuations, buy-outs and closure of offices, with tax clearance and final repatriation of capital |
Why foreign investors instruct us
Dual qualification. English Bar training and Bangladeshi Supreme Court practice in one team, so the agreement and its enforcement are planned together.
Enforcement-first drafting. Every clause is written with the Bangladeshi court, RJSC and Bangladesh Bank in mind, not only the negotiating table.
Advocacy at the apex court. When a dispute arises, the same chamber that drafted the agreement can take it to the High Court Division and Appellate Division.
Current on reform. We track changes such as the Invest Bangladesh Act, 2026, new commercial courts and each Bangladesh Bank circular, and update clients' documents accordingly.
Direct partner attention. Matters are supervised by the Head of Chamber, with clear fees and regular reporting.
To discuss an investment, a joint venture or a dispute with a local partner, contact The Justice Corner:
Office: 37/2 Purana Paltan, Pritom-Zaman Tower, Level 11, Suite 1207, Dhaka-1000
Phone: +88 01760907777
Email: info@justicecornerbd.com
Web: justicecornerbd.com
Mohammad Imam Hossain (Tareq) Advocate, Supreme Court of Bangladesh · Barrister-at-Law (Middle Temple) Head of Chamber, The Justice Corner, Dhaka
This article is general information on the law as of October 2026, not legal advice for a specific transaction.
